Skip to content
IOP Science

Editorial Board Guidance: Professor Jianping Li

To assist Early Career Researchers, we asked Editorial Board Members what advice they would give to navigate the early stages of academic publishing. 

Read what Professor Jianping Li, (Ocean University of China) Editorial Board Member of Environmental Research: Letters, what advice he had for Early Career Researchers: 

Jianping Li

“Firstly, choose a clear research direction that you are interested in. I think this is very important for a professional career.
Secondly, find a supportive network. Find senior scientists who can provide guidance to help you develop.
Third, is to publish earlier and often. You should learn how to write for publication. And aim for the quality and the impact.
The fourth, stay resilient and embrace failure. Success requires persistence and adaptation. So, I think those suggestions may be helpful to early career researchers.”

Editorial Board Guidance: Dr Scott Goetz

We asked our Editorial Board Members what tips they have for Early Career Researchers.

Read what Dr Scott Goetz, (Northern Arizona University), Editor-in-Chief of Environmental Research Ecology, has to say:

Dr Scott Goetz Editor in chief

“My advice is that Early Career Researchers should consider reviewing articles for the journal. It’s a great way to learn, not just by reading the work but seeing the formulative stages. You’ll learn what is important and maybe identify if there is something missing. Peer reviewing is a great way to learn, and it can help to advance your career.”

Operating your transformative agreement – guidelines

Whether you are already in a transformative agreement with IOP Publishing or are considering one, these guidelines aim to cover the details of how we will operate your agreement.

If you need more detail on any of the points covered, or have additional questions, please contact your Regional Manager or e-mail us at ta@ioppublishing.org and we will be happy to help.

We take care of the identification of authors. You can rest assured that the below eligibility criteria are automatically applied and eligible articles are identified for open access (OA) funding. We will contact corresponding authors to let them know they can publish OA. There are no additional tasks for authors to be able to access your funding.

Our criteria for eligibility

The following are our criteria for determining whether an article will be published under a transformative agreement (TA):

Corresponding author: We use the corresponding author nominated at the point of submission.
Affiliation:  This is the affiliation of the corresponding author at the point of submission. The affiliation needs to be an institution within a licence. Where an author has a dual affiliation, we use the primary affiliation provided within the submission system to identify TA eligibility.
Journal:  This must be one of the journals in the eligible journals list, depending on the journals included in your licence, which can be viewed on your dedicated support page.
Article type: All chargeable article types are covered; articles, letters and reviews (except for Reports on Progress in PhysicsTM which excludes reviews)
Acceptance date:  Eligible articles are those accepted within the licence period.
Article cap: Some of our agreements have article caps in place. These are allocated in order of article acceptance date. We will seek approval for each individual article, with your nominated library contact. See our below section on validation

More about how we operate your transformative agreement:
• TA eligibility is tied to the corresponding author, and we have processes in place to ensure that this remains the same person from submission through to publication.
• TA eligibility is tied to a fixed event: the point of submission. Authors sometimes change their affiliation, but by aligning TA eligibility with this fixed point in time, it helps us to provide continuity in the author experience.
• We use the institution name in the submission form to define whether someone is TA-eligible, rather than any associated documents that are uploaded with the submission.
• We use the institution name to identify eligible articles, which allows authors to use non-institutional email addresses which are commonplace in many parts of the globe.
• Before the TA begins, we use historical submission data to record any variations of institution name being used by authors. This ensures that we capture as many eligible articles as possible.
• We also use fuzzy logic to pick up misspelled institution names to ensure greater coverage of identification services.

See information on author roles and responsibilities here.
You might find it useful to look through our author guide for submitting under a TA here. It is also available in video format.

Capped and unlimited agreements
In unlimited agreements, we save librarians time and administrative effort through our robust article identification, which is extremely reliable with >90% accuracy rates. We take the responsibility to identify articles correctly and inform authors that they can publish OA.

Contact openaccesscharging@ioppublishing.org if you spot anything incorrect.

For capped agreements, we will send timely validation requests to your nominated contact, which are processed as a priority. Consortia can either nominate a contact at each university, or a central contact to receive validation requests on behalf of the members.

Retrospectives
We can offer retrospective OA for eligible articles on the rare occasion that they were missed and were published less than 11 months ago. Our TA Operations team proactively search for missed articles, but you can also tell us if you become aware of a missed article by emailing the DOI or article ID openaccesscharging@ioppublishing.org.

The author must agree and sign a new CC BY copyright licence if the article has been published on a subscription basis. This short video provides more information on copyright within a TA.

In the case where an OA article needs to be retrospectively recognised under a TA, the author/funder would be refunded the article publication charge.

Why do we impose a deadline for retrospective open access?
One of our commitments to OA is that no customer should pay twice. We set our subscription prices based on the levels of OA within each journal, and so we need a deadline upon which to assess that level. After a year the embargo placed on authors for green OA is lifted, making it possible for them to share their accepted manuscript on certain repositories.

For further information, see IOP Publishing’s green open access policy.

Authors opting out
We proactively follow up with librarians in real time when we see authors opting out of OA. This gives the library a chance to follow up with authors if they wish to, to understand their reasons. This can often result in authors changing their mind and publishing OA. Opt outs are very rare, with only 2-3%* of our TA-eligible authors opting out in the last year, and many of these opted back in once librarian contact had been established.

*Based on 2024 data.

This Myth vs Fact sheet aims to address some of the common reasons for authors to opt out.

Copyright
Articles published through TAs are published under a CC BY license. This license allows others to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the author’s work as long the original work is appropriately credited. We created this short video to provide more information to authors. It covers;
• What is a CC BY licence and why is it important?
• What does it mean for me?
• How do I fill out the copyright form?

Reporting
We provide quarterly reporting in excel. Reporting is done at the agreement level and contains all the key metadata for the articles that have been assigned to your TA.

If you are participating in the OA Switchboard’s ‘reporting made easy’ service, you will be able to report on IOP Publishing’s OA articles. OA Switchboard is an independent intermediary which enables academic institutions and research funding organisations to monitor information relating to OA research outputs via a central information hub. You can find out more about joining here.

Signposting your agreement
We signpost your agreement on our Journal Finder tool. This is a free-to-use tool which enables authors to easily check if the journal they would like to publish their work in complies with their funder requirements, or if it is covered by a TA. It aims to streamline the OA publishing workflow and unburden researchers.

We also signpost it on our TA Hub by creating a dedicated page for each country. This allows authors to easily browse and discover agreements.

These signposts are placed throughout our Publishing support pages, within our submission form, in our notifications of funding to authors and within publishing information on our journal homepages. We aim to ensure that authors are well informed of their funding options at all the important stages of their publication journey.

We are compliant with ESAC workflow guidelines provided by the Efficiency and Standards for Article Charges Initiative. We recommend that you add details of your agreement to the ESAC database as this in turn feeds through to the Journal Checker tool – another way to help your researchers discover their funding options. esac-initiative.org

Find out more
Further information and resources to help you support and promote your agreement are available here:
TA Hub
Frequently asked questions for authors and librarians
Library resources page
TA Playlist on YouTube

 

Researchers from Tunisia

IOP Publishing (IOP) has a transformative agreement with a number of CNUDST to enable a transition towards open access publishing.

Who can benefit?
All corresponding authors that are current staff members, researchers (permanent, temporary and visiting), or students at one of the institutions below at the point of submission, can publish open access at no cost to themselves. The corresponding author is the person listed as Corresponding Author at the time of submission, and is the person responsible for communicating with the journal during the peer review and publication process.

What’s included?
• Articles accepted will be eligible for transformative agreement funding to enable authors to publish open access with no cost to themselves
• Research paper, Focus Collection, letter and review article types
• Included journals are those in lists A, B, C and D. Click here for a full title list of eligible journals.

Please note
Funding is subject to librarian funding approval at acceptance stage. If for any reason funding is declined, the author(s) will have the opportunity to revert to subscription publication type at zero cost to themselves or the member institution.

You may find our author guide for submitting under a transformative agreement helpful located in our Transformative Agreement hub.

Eligible institutions

Instituts supérieurs des études technologiques
Ministère de l’enseignement supérieur et de la recherche scientifique
Université de Carthage
Université de Gabès
Université de Gafsa
Université de Jendouba
Université de Kairouan
Université de La Manouba
Université de Monastir
Université de Sfax
Université de Sousse
Université de Tunis
Université de Tunis El Manar

Image manipulation

Within IOP Publishing, we perform visual and technology-assisted checks on submission to detect the inappropriate presentation of images. Any changes made to images such as changes to the contrast, colour or brightness must be declared during submission and within the text of the manuscript. Alterations made to the images should not affect the information illustrated in the figures and should not change any image to the extent a viewer would reach a different conclusion because of the edits. Images should always have clear captions, with information such as scale bar length included where necessary. 

Changes made to the brightness, contrast, magnification, etc, of one image in a figure should be applied equally to all images of the same type in the same figure, and should be declared unambiguously in the text, ideally in the caption. 

Editing images for aesthetics/beautification should be avoided unless necessary. If any form of image processing is legitimately required for the interpretation of the data, the software and the enhancement technique must be declared in the methods section of the manuscript. It is good practice when images have been substantially processed to provide the original unedited images in the Supplementary Information, or in an accessible repository linked to from the paper. 

All image manipulation concerns will be investigated by the Research Integrity team within IOP Publishing according to COPE guidelines.  If authors fail to provide original images and address our concerns, the submission will be rejected if still in peer review. If the paper has already been published, we will take corrective action as appropriate. 

Researchers from France

IOP Publishing (IOP) has a transformative agreement with COUPERIN in France to enable a transition to open access publishing.

Who can benefit?
All corresponding authors that are current staff members, researchers (permanent, temporary and visiting), or students at one of the institutions below at the point of submission, can publish open access at no cost to themselves. The corresponding author is the person listed as Corresponding Author at the time of submission, and is the person responsible for communicating with the journal during the peer review and publication process.

What’s included?
• Articles accepted will be eligible for transformative agreement funding to enable authors to publish open access with no cost to themselves
• Research paper, Focus Collection, letter and review article types
• Included journals are those in lists A, B, C and D in the title list of eligible journals.

Sign up for our forthcoming webinar to find out more about the agreement:
Open access for France with IOP Publishing
23 September 2025, 1400 – 1530 CEST

Please note
You may find our author guide for submitting under a transformative agreement helpful located in our Transformative Agreement hub.

Eligible insitutions 
Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology*
Avignon Université
Commissariat à l’Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (CEA)*
CY Cergy Paris Université
École centrale de Lyon*
École Normale Supérieure de Lyon*
École Polytechnique*
Institut Laue-Langevin
Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon
Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Rouen
Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Toulouse
Office National d’Études et de Recherches Aérospatiales (ONERA)*
Sorbonne Université*
Université Côte d’Azur*
Université de Bordeaux*
Université de Caen Normandie (also includes ENSICAEN)
Université de Montpellier*
Université de Picardie Jules Verne
Université de Rennes
Université de Strasbourg
Université de technologie de Troyes*
Université de Toulouse*
Université d’Orléans
Université Grenoble Alpes
Université Jean Monnet Saint-Étienne
Université Paris Cité
Université Paris-Saclay*
Université PSL*

*Please note funding is subject to librarian funding approval at acceptance stage. If for any reason funding is declined, the author(s) will have the opportunity to revert to subscription publication type at zero cost to themselves or the member institution.

CRediT

CRediT is a 14 role taxonomy that can be used to describe the key types of contributions typically made to the production and publication of research output. IOP Publishing offers authors the chance to declare what specific contribution they have made on their article, based on the CRediT taxonomy. If accepted for publication, these roles will be displayed in the published article.

More information about CRediT

What are the 14 contributor roles?

  • Conceptualization – Ideas; formulation or evolution of overarching research goals and aims.
  • Data curation – Management activities to annotate (produce metadata), scrub data and maintain research data (including software code, where it is necessary for interpreting the data itself) for initial use and later re-use.
  • Formal analysis – Application of statistical, mathematical, computational, or other formal techniques to analyze or synthesize study data.
  • Funding acquisition – Acquisition of the financial support for the project leading to this publication.
  • Investigation – Conducting a research and investigation process, specifically performing the experiments, or data/evidence collection.
  • Methodology – Development or design of methodology; creation of models.
  • Project administration – Management and coordination responsibility for the research activity planning and execution.
  • Resources – Provision of study materials, reagents, materials, patients, laboratory samples, animals, instrumentation, computing resources, or other analysis tools.
  • Software – Programming, software development; designing computer programs; implementation of the computer code and supporting algorithms; testing of existing code components.
  • Supervision – Oversight and leadership responsibility for the research activity planning and execution, including mentorship external to the core team.
  • Validation – Verification, whether as a part of the activity or separate, of the overall replication/reproducibility of results/experiments and other research outputs.
  • Visualization – Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work, specifically visualization/data presentation.
  • Writing – original draft – Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work, specifically writing the initial draft (including substantive translation).
  • Writing – review & editing – Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work by those from the original research group, specifically critical review, commentary or revision – including pre- or post-publication stages

Who qualifies for authorship?

The ICMJE recommends that authorship be based on the following 4 criteria:

  • Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND
  • Drafting the work or reviewing it critically for important intellectual content; AND
  • Final approval of the version to be published; AND
  • Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Not all CRediT contributions mean someone qualifies for authorship. IOP Publishing follows the ICMJE guidelines, which says “Examples of activities that alone (without other contributions) do not qualify a contributor for authorship are acquisition of funding; general supervision of a research group or general administrative support; and writing assistance, technical editing, language editing, and proofreading.” If a contributor does not qualify for authorship, they should be listed in the acknowledgements rather than in the author list.

All co-authors will be able to see the CRediT roles they have been assigned throughout the peer review process. If an author disagrees with the CRediT role(s) that have been assigned, this should be brought to the attention of the journal and the submission will be sent back to the authors for agreement, correction and resubmission by the authors. This will halt the peer review process and will not resume until the corrected manuscript is resubmitted. The journal will not arbitrate in matters of disputed contributions, as per the COPE guidelines. If the authors cannot come to an agreement, IOP Publishing will escalate the dispute to the institution(s) concerned for a decision.

The ICMJE guidelines also state “It is the collective responsibility of the authors, not the journal to which the work is submitted, to determine that all people named as authors meet all four criteria; it is not the role of journal editors to determine who qualifies or does not qualify for authorship or to arbitrate authorship conflicts.” Therefore, in the event of a dispute between authors about contributions, the journal will not arbitrate. Instead IOP Publishing will escalate the dispute to the institution(s) concerned for a decision.

How to assign CRediT roles to authors

When you are getting ready to submit an article, make sure that you have discussed and agreed with your co-authors and contributors the roles that individuals have played.

It is the submitting author’s responsibility to assign CRediT roles across the author list.

Add the author and click on ‘Provide CRediT Contribution’.

Screenshot of how to add CRediT for an author

Tick the relevant roles in the list and define what level of contribution was made – lead, equal or supporting.

Screenshot of how to add CRediT roles for an author

Click “save changes” at the bottom of the page.

The roles will then be visible on the manuscript information page.

 

Points to note

  • CRediT roles are optional – We do not mandate any or all authors having CRediT roles, however it is strongly encouraged;
  • Individuals can have several roles – it is common that researchers will have made several contributions to a research output (e.g. article) and can therefore be assigned to more than one CRediT role;
  • The same role can be assigned to multiple individuals – a specific CRediT role can also be assigned to multiple individuals;
  • Some roles won’t apply – each research output is different; if specific CRediT roles are not relevant to a particular output, they do not need to be included;
  • Some contributors may not qualify for authorship –if a contributor does not qualify for authorship (link to our policy), they should not be added to the author list, instead they can be listed in the acknowledgements;
  • Degree of contribution is optional – where multiple individuals serve in the same role, the degree of contribution can optionally be specified as ‘lead’, ‘equal’, or ‘supporting’.

What’s it like to be on an IOP Publishing Editorial Board?

On this page, you can explore the different editorial board roles, hear directly from board members about their experiences, and watch interviews that offer insights into what it’s like to be part of our journal boards.
Scroll down to find out more.


At a recent conference, we asked some of our Editorial Board members from the Environmental Research Series what it is like to be on an IOP Publishing Editorial Board. Watch the video to find out what they had to say:


Find out more about the roles

Editor-in-Chief

Editors-in-Chief work with the Publisher of the journal to set and implement the editorial direction and vision of the journal, and maintain the agreed standards of peer review and research integrity. They provide leadership and management of the Editorial Board, chairing Editorial Board Meetings and sharing the journal’s vision and goals.

Executive Editor

Executive Editors give their journal its scientific authority. Their role is to provide intelligence on the latest scientific developments in the field, and to implement the commissioning plan.

Editorial Board Member

Editorial Board Members ensure that the content published in the journal meets the journal’s quality standards by providing consultative peer review support, aided by their knowledge of the journal’s strategy.

All members of Editorial Boards serve as the public face and champion of the journal, promoting it within the research community.

Back to Editorial hub page


Meet our Editorial Colleagues

Hear from existing IOP Publishing Editorial Board members about their experiences:

 

Editor-in-Chief – Professor Michael Thorne

“I have been on the Editorial Board of the Journal of Radiological Protection for about 25 years and have been Editor-in-Chief for the last 3 years. This is a Partner Society Journal with the Society for Radiological Protection and I find the collaboration with IOPP very fruitful in helping the Society fulfil its role in advancing the science and art of radiological protection.

A particularly enjoyable aspect of Board membership is the opportunity to stimulate the publication of papers on subjects across the whole spectrum of radiological protection, and the chance to interact with other members of the Editorial Board with a wide range of backgrounds and experience. Perhaps my favourite part of the role is reviewing all the papers published during the year with a view to identifying a shortlist of those that are both innovative and useful. This then gives me an opportunity to write an editorial drawing attention to these papers and discussing their implications.

As I approach the end of my career, I hope that I can convey to readers the continuing opportunity of seeking innovative solutions to the multi-disciplinary challenges that arise in radiological protection.” – Dr Michael Thorne, Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Radiological Protection


Editorial Board Member – Dr Ayat-Allah Bouramdane

“What motivated me to join the Editorial Board of Environmental Research: Energy was the diversity of the team, we have members from different universities and different countries which means we have diverse voices, with different ages, disciplines, and experience. This is very crucial for the multi-disciplinary fields of Environmental Research: Energy.

We have members with industry and policy making experience, which is important as it provides practical insights into how academic research aligns with real-world applications. We also have members from developing and emerging countries so that we can provide perspective on the particular needs of our community. In addition, I really appreciate the spirit of collaboration, it seems like a shared mission.

I like the mutual respect between editorial members and being part of the Editorial Board keeps me up-to-date with emerging topics and can open doors for collaboration and to a wide network of experience.” – Dr Ayat-Allah Bouramdane, Editorial Board Member, Environmental Research: Energy


Editorial Board Member – Dr Michael Mueck

“With the advent of the internet, a larger number of ‘scientific journals’ have appeared, whose editors and editorial boards (if any) are certainly more interested in the number of papers published in their journals than in the scientific quality of these works.  Only publishers willing to sacrifice possible profits will produce journals of a high standing.  Here an editorial board with members who critically check the quality of each and every paper published in their journal can help prevent an increasing distrust in the credibility not only of these particular journals, but in scientific publications at all.” –Dr Michael Mueck, Editorial Board Member, Superconductor Science and Technology


Editorial Board Member – Professor Alain Moïse Dikandé

“Being a member of the editorial board of Journal of Optics for over 5 years now has been an enriching experience for a scientist like me, working in a region of Africa suffering from secular isolation due to common beliefs that nothing interesting can come from the region if not poverty, misery and wars. Having the opportunity to work together with the worldwide scientific community to promote quality research in my domain of specialization, played an important role both in boosting my motivation to work despite unfavorable socio-political challenges, and to constantly seeking excellence in my research activities.” –Professor Alain Moïse Dikandé, Editorial Board Member, Journal of Optics

 


Back to Editorial hub page